Unreviewed PRs (%)

The percentage of pull requests that were merged into the main codebase without receiving any code reviews from other team members.

Excellent (0–5%) - indicates a very strong review culture with high compliance and a strong focus on quality. Current practices should be maintained and potentially used as a benchmark for others.
Good (5–15%) - reflects generally solid review practices, typical of well-functioning teams. While no major issues are present, it’s wise to monitor trends and make minor improvements where needed.
Concerning (15–30%) - suggests a notable portion of code is bypassing peer review, raising the risk of bugs and quality issues. The root causes should be investigated and process improvements implemented.
Critical (>30%) - shows that most code changes are not being peer-reviewed, posing serious risks to code quality and security. An immediate and comprehensive process overhaul is necessary.

Don't forget you can anytime include any metric in your Custom Dashboards.

Updated about 24 hours ago